<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad Review: Screen Peel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/comment-page-1/#comment-10259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/#comment-10259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m adding a link to a game I&#039;m hooked on, but these ads for breast enchancement are horrible - and why put them here?  I know this site is neutral but those are the kind of ads that I keep ad-blocking enabled for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m adding a link to a game I&#8217;m hooked on, but these ads for breast enchancement are horrible &#8211; and why put them here?  I know this site is neutral but those are the kind of ads that I keep ad-blocking enabled for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hungarter</title>
		<link>http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/comment-page-1/#comment-4480</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hungarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/#comment-4480</guid>
		<description>Are you sure that Visual Steel is responsible for this technology?
Why do they make no mention of it anywhere on their site (badly in need of a redesign)?
The ads look mildly interesting, I would like to know who the creator(s) is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure that Visual Steel is responsible for this technology?<br />
Why do they make no mention of it anywhere on their site (badly in need of a redesign)?<br />
The ads look mildly interesting, I would like to know who the creator(s) is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adblock</title>
		<link>http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>adblock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adblock.org/2006/03/ad-review-screen-peel/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>I realize it&#039;s flash, of course, and I&#039;m glad for you that it&#039;s easily blockable.  You must know by now that I&#039;m happy with you blocking whatever you wish, as long as you&#039;re the one knowingly doing the blocking on your computer.  Hopefully you only block stuff that you find unreasonable and you keep the website owner in mind.

Yes, I should have mentioned the CPU usage.  It does run actively so that it does it&#039;s pulsing thing.  I noticed it&#039;s animation slow down by more than half when the window lost it&#039;s focus (on OS X.  Don&#039;t know if Windows is smart enough to do that.)  Can&#039;t say that it&#039;s bothering my computer anyway.

Besides, I would hope that Information Week knows their demographic well enough to realize that they&#039;re mostly on high-enough bandwidth connections to support their advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize it&#8217;s flash, of course, and I&#8217;m glad for you that it&#8217;s easily blockable.  You must know by now that I&#8217;m happy with you blocking whatever you wish, as long as you&#8217;re the one knowingly doing the blocking on your computer.  Hopefully you only block stuff that you find unreasonable and you keep the website owner in mind.</p>
<p>Yes, I should have mentioned the CPU usage.  It does run actively so that it does it&#8217;s pulsing thing.  I noticed it&#8217;s animation slow down by more than half when the window lost it&#8217;s focus (on OS X.  Don&#8217;t know if Windows is smart enough to do that.)  Can&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s bothering my computer anyway.</p>
<p>Besides, I would hope that Information Week knows their demographic well enough to realize that they&#8217;re mostly on high-enough bandwidth connections to support their advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
